Probing ChatGPT & LLMs: Unraveling Strengths and Boundaries in Compositional Problem Solving

Probing ChatGPT & LLMs: Unraveling Strengths and Boundaries in Compositional Problem Solving

Probing ChatGPT & LLMs: Unraveling Strengths and Boundaries in Compositional Problem Solving

As Seen On

Probing ChatGPT & LLMs: Unraveling Strengths and Boundaries in Compositional Problem Solving

Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT, PaLM, LLaMA, and BERT have taken the world by storm, transforming how we interact with machines and implement natural language processing. These models, powered by Transformers, are being increasingly deployed for various applications, including customer support, social media content filtering, and automated content generation. A recent research study has put the spotlight on these models’ capabilities in solving compositional problems, presenting intriguing yet vital findings.

Two Competing Hypotheses

Researchers examining Transformers’ capabilities in compositional problem-solving proposed two hypotheses in their study. The first hypothesis suggests that these AI models can transform complex multi-step reasoning into a linearized matching of subgraphs. Essentially, the models learn to match the appropriate language prompts’ patterns through training data, which makes the process of reasoning detectable as a sequence of steps.

The second hypothesis highlights the inherent limitations of Transformers in solving high-complexity compositional tasks. Despite their impressive natural language understanding capabilities, these LLMs might struggle with solving rare or highly complex examples that have not been adequately represented in the training dataset.

Deciphering Compositional Tasks

The researchers employed three distinct types of compositional tasks to evaluate the Transformers’ capacity in handling complex reasoning. These tasks included multi-digit multiplication, logic grid puzzles, and a classic dynamic programming problem. These tasks served as a reliable benchmark to assess the models’ problem-solving abilities under different reasoning structures and challenges.

Computation Graphs: A Key Tool

In order to understand how Transformers solve these compositional tasks, researchers utilized computation graphs. The tasks were decomposed into submodular functional steps, which were then verbalized as input sequences for the models. By following the input-output dynamics in these computation graphs, the researchers could identify the strengths and weaknesses of the Transformers and how they struggle with computational errors.

Predicting Patterns through Information Gain

An information gain method was applied to predict the Transformers’ patterns, which offered insights into their capabilities and limitations. This analytical approach computed the distribution of information from inputs to outputs, effectively shedding light on how successfully the models can generalize their problem-solving abilities.

Findings: Strengths, Limitations, and Errors

The research findings corroborate the first hypothesis, suggesting that Transformers can match linearized subgraph representations to infer reasoning when given appropriate cues. However, the second hypothesis also holds merit, as LLMs like ChatGPT have limitations in solving uncommon, complex examples.

One notable aspect found in the Transformers was the significant amount of early computational and compounding errors. These mistakes resulted from the models incorrectly interpreting or answering some of the initial steps. As a result, these early errors negatively affect the models’ overall performance in solving complex compositional tasks.

As machine learning enthusiasts, developers, and data scientists strive to push the boundaries of AI, insights from this research can alleviate existing limitations and enhance the utility of LLMs in more advanced, problem-solving applications.

Casey Jones Avatar
Casey Jones
12 months ago

Why Us?

  • Award-Winning Results

  • Team of 11+ Experts

  • 10,000+ Page #1 Rankings on Google

  • Dedicated to SMBs

  • $175,000,000 in Reported Client

Contact Us

Up until working with Casey, we had only had poor to mediocre experiences outsourcing work to agencies. Casey & the team at CJ&CO are the exception to the rule.

Communication was beyond great, his understanding of our vision was phenomenal, and instead of needing babysitting like the other agencies we worked with, he was not only completely dependable but also gave us sound suggestions on how to get better results, at the risk of us not needing him for the initial job we requested (absolute gem).

This has truly been the first time we worked with someone outside of our business that quickly grasped our vision, and that I could completely forget about and would still deliver above expectations.

I honestly can't wait to work in many more projects together!

Contact Us


*The information this blog provides is for general informational purposes only and is not intended as financial or professional advice. The information may not reflect current developments and may be changed or updated without notice. Any opinions expressed on this blog are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect the views of the author’s employer or any other organization. You should not act or rely on any information contained in this blog without first seeking the advice of a professional. No representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this blog. The author and affiliated parties assume no liability for any errors or omissions.