The tech giant Google has found itself in the crossfire of privacy and consumer protection advocates as it faces allegations of illicit data use for AI training. If proven guilty, the behemoth may be faced with a hefty $5 billion class action lawsuit.
Eight individuals, represented by the Clarkson Law Firm, have brought forth claims of Google illegally profiting from digital content shared by Americans. This data, they say, was unsolicitedly harvested to train AI products such as Google’s chatbot, “Bard.”
The alleged victims argue that Google’s data collection strategy raises grave copyright issues. If the case is won, it could have profound implications for online marketers who utilize Google’s suite of AI tools and thus need to reassess their data sourcing practices.
According to the claimants, Google has been indiscriminately gathering content produced by the American public. This allegedly involves a host of materials: personal photos, curated playlists, videos, favorite books, and more. It is believed that this discreetly sourced information has been the fuel behind Google’s advancements in artificial intelligence, including chatbot ‘Bard.’
The plaintiffs, choosing to remain anonymous, engaged the Clarkson Law Firm to issue the claim, and it’s not their first rodeo with AI litigation. The firm had previously locked horns with OpenAI, alleging similar violations of consumer privacy.
In this class action lawsuit against Google, the plaintiffs demand an immediate halt of the disputed data collection practices. They also appeal for an option for consumers to opt out of data collection, have their data erased, or receive fair compensation for the use of their digital content.
Not surprisingly, plaintiff lawyer Ryan Clarkson has openly criticized Google’s alleged behavior, framing it as a gross violation of digital privacy laws. He has spotlighted Google’s unmonitored power and vast reach into consumer’s lives as a significant concern – a thought echoed by privacy advocates worldwide.
However, the jury is still out on the potential outcomes of this saga. Legal experts suggest that it could create legal precedents and redefine how tech companies collect and use data, placing considerable importance on the respect of privacy and digital rights.
Provoking thought and action around the safeguarding of online privacy, this lawsuit invites tech enthusiasts, digital marketers, AI stakeholders, and in fact, anyone in the digital space to follow this story closely. As this evolves, it serves as a reminder to consider your own online privacy and how your individual data could be used in unexpected ways.
Up until working with Casey, we had only had poor to mediocre experiences outsourcing work to agencies. Casey & the team at CJ&CO are the exception to the rule.
Communication was beyond great, his understanding of our vision was phenomenal, and instead of needing babysitting like the other agencies we worked with, he was not only completely dependable but also gave us sound suggestions on how to get better results, at the risk of us not needing him for the initial job we requested (absolute gem).
This has truly been the first time we worked with someone outside of our business that quickly grasped our vision, and that I could completely forget about and would still deliver above expectations.
I honestly can't wait to work in many more projects together!
![The ‘Giveaway Piggy Back Scam’ In Full Swing [2022]](https://www.cjco.com.au/wp-content/uploads/pexels-nataliya-vaitkevich-7172791-1-scaled-2-683x1024.jpg)
Disclaimer
*The information this blog provides is for general informational purposes only and is not intended as financial or professional advice. The information may not reflect current developments and may be changed or updated without notice. Any opinions expressed on this blog are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect the views of the author’s employer or any other organization. You should not act or rely on any information contained in this blog without first seeking the advice of a professional. No representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this blog. The author and affiliated parties assume no liability for any errors or omissions.
