The first incident on June 7 lasted for 2 hours and 28 minutes and stemmed from a delay in our internal job queue, specifically involved in processing Git pushes. Contributing to this delay was a client making a vast number of pushes to a repository bearing a unique data shape. This unusual activity resulted in the jobs processing these pushes being throttled when interfacing with the Git backend, leading to an subsequently extended job execution times. The ripple effect of this incident was felt in the GitHub Actions workflow run, causing webhook delays and disrupting pull requests.
Fast forward to June 29, North and South America suffered a service outage that lasted 32 minutes. Traditionally, redundancy protocols perform accurately during live failover tests, however, this time, they failed, revealing a network path configuration issue. Quick response measures, once the issue was identified, significantly aided in prompt rectification.
In response to the June 7 incident, a comprehensive remedial strategy was developed. Chief amongst these was the modification of the Git backend’s throttling behavior and a reduction of the Git client timeout. These measures are part of a larger plan devised to expedite the detection, diagnosis, and recovery of similar incidents in the future.
The June 29 service incident shed light on the need to further enhance GitHub’s failover testing protocols. The network path configuration issue which led to public connectivity loss was promptly addressed upon detection. This unexpected occurrence served as an eye-opener and triggered preemptive measures to bridge configuration and failover testing gaps.
June’s incidents underscored the complexity of maintaining service reliability, particularly for a platform like GitHub that handles a large volume of Git pushes daily. They also reminded us of our role in fostering a reliable ecosystem for developers, GitHub users, and website administrators across the globe.
In light of these incidents, we reiterate our commitment to ensuring high reliability and minimizing service disruptions. Through the lessons learned, we’re zealously advancing robust recovery strategies and frameworks that will elevate service availability while curtailing incidents.
We encourage our readers to continue exploring the intricacies of GitHub’s infrastructure and service integrity. To keep abreast of our ongoing growth and development roadmap, feel free to signup for platform updates, exclusively available to our subscribing userbase.
By addressing the technically challenging issues gleaned from the recent incidents, we look forward to fortifying our platform and ensuring an unshakable commitment to service reliability and high availability. After all, every setback is a setup for an impressive comeback – and at GitHub, we’re all about turning challenges into improvements.
Up until working with Casey, we had only had poor to mediocre experiences outsourcing work to agencies. Casey & the team at CJ&CO are the exception to the rule.
Communication was beyond great, his understanding of our vision was phenomenal, and instead of needing babysitting like the other agencies we worked with, he was not only completely dependable but also gave us sound suggestions on how to get better results, at the risk of us not needing him for the initial job we requested (absolute gem).
This has truly been the first time we worked with someone outside of our business that quickly grasped our vision, and that I could completely forget about and would still deliver above expectations.
I honestly can't wait to work in many more projects together!
![The ‘Giveaway Piggy Back Scam’ In Full Swing [2022]](https://www.cjco.com.au/wp-content/uploads/pexels-nataliya-vaitkevich-7172791-1-scaled-2-683x1024.jpg)
Disclaimer
*The information this blog provides is for general informational purposes only and is not intended as financial or professional advice. The information may not reflect current developments and may be changed or updated without notice. Any opinions expressed on this blog are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect the views of the author’s employer or any other organization. You should not act or rely on any information contained in this blog without first seeking the advice of a professional. No representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this blog. The author and affiliated parties assume no liability for any errors or omissions.
